|
||||||||||||||||||||
Log in: |
Learning Outcomes for Attitudes, Ethical Understanding and Legal ResponsibilitiesLevel 1 - How the doctor approaches their practiceLevel 2 - Outcomes for Attitudes, Ethical Understanding and Legal Responsibilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 |
This could include: Level 4 |
|
Appropriate professional attitudes |
Establishing trust between doctor and patient and respect for patients and colleagues. Adopting an empathic, holistic approach to patients and their problems. Valuing and preserving patient autonomy and involving patients in decisions affecting them. Respect for professional institutions and health service bodies. Awareness of public opinion. |
|
Basic ethical principles and standards |
Knowledge and understanding of contemporary medical ethics and the main ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. The duties of a doctor. Practical application of theories e.g. consequentialism, deontology (duty) and double effect. The importance of confidentiality, truthfulness and integrity. Knowing under what circumstances the breaking of confidentiality can and should occur Dealing effectively with complaints about own performance. |
|
Legal responsibilities |
Particularly with respect to: |
|
Knowledge of and respect for differing cultures, views, beliefs and practices relating to the human body and healthcare. |
|
|
Those arising from patients and colleagues and relating to the multitude of differing characteristics making up the human personality. |
|
|
Economic issues |
Knowledge and appreciation of financial constraints affecting the NHS and their impact on delivery of care. |
|
Contributing to the advancement of medicine |
Progress in medical science and how it is achieved, particularly the potential for every doctor to contribute to such progress. The doctors role in ethical regulated clinical trials. |
Experience and literature indicate that using a variety of different assessment techniques is more reliable than use of one only (triangulation). In practice, this observation makes the task easier, since many aspects of medical education require use of a variety of examination types.
A formative component of each of these is always present (even though not always recognised), and enhances the attempt to assess. In other words, PROCESS may be as important as OUTCOME, and participation in process can legitimately be included in the ratings made for assessment.
Recommended methods of assessment include:
OSCE
OSLER
Case Studies
MEQ
Short notes
Other methods that should be considered are:
Recorded attendance at educational sessions
Defining Issues Test
Portfolios